« Go Colloquial--and Go Global | Main | Google- Yahoo Partnership Coming True? »

Ethics? Spelled backwards, it’s Scihte!

34591032_thb.jpg

Does that mean you CAN bid on trademark terms?
Ethics are icky and sticky when it comes to online marketing and advertising. We still haven’t reached the true outline of what that means, or when there is a serious violation of privacy whether it be personal or business information and names. Seriously, folks, here we are in another long drawn out election year, where we, as our American duty, have to pick out who the truth teller is. I can hear some politicians state the following quote from Darby Conley:
“Ethics are so annoying. I avoid them on principle.”

Where do we, as internet marketers stand with the so called “ethics”? Sometimes, because we stand on the cutting edge of marketing and advertising, some ideas that seem good could turn out to be “unethical”. There are loose definitions, such as Google’s take on trademark terms.

And if you want to read s’more stuff about trademark bidding, here are Yahoo’s stipulations.
The AMA has a code of their own set ethics.

And I’ll bet the candidates running for president are bidding on eachother’s names. When I looked up Obama on Google, I saw at the bottom, on searches related to Obama, Hillary shows up there as well as John Edwards.
Seems like money and ethics are always tied together, so shouldn’t MONEY be ETHICS spelled backwards? Would it be a violation of the trademarked term “ethics” if “money” bid on it?

You are so MONEY, you don't even know it.

|
80x15-digg-standard-badge-2.gif   Add to Del.icio.us!

Post a comment