A (Hopefully) Objective Look at Health-Care Reform
January 31st, 2007 by Maribeth Neelis
There’s no question; the health-insurance industry is floundering–millions uninsured, ever-increasing premiums accompanied by less comprehensive coverage.
And although President Bush’s health proposal has its critics, it addresses an issue that has long plagued Americans, particularly the 47 million uninsured.
His proposal, while vastly different from former President Clinton’s attempt at health-care reform, has one similarity. It guarantees to upend a health-insurance system that has covered most Americans for the last 60 years.
And even though change is inevitable, especially the reform of a faulty system, it has the tendency to incite fear and doubt.
But let’s not jump to partisan conclusions just yet.
The state of affairs…for now
The least expensive, most popular way to purchase health insurance is tax free through an employer. If an individual contributes, he or she is covered, regardless of health or age.
Because many partake in their employers’ health insurance program, the majority of uninsured Americans comprise lower-income families, children and minorities. However, in recent years the issue has ceased being one of socio-economic status or race and begun to affect middle-class Americans, many of whom are self employed or working for small businesses that don’t offer health insurance.
The uninsured masses either purchase individual health insurance, with no tax deductions, or remain uninsured and possibly dependent on government programs, such as Medicaid.








According to an article 
